Posts Tagged ‘ rejects

Labour Board Rejects Unions Latest Attempt to Block Worker Choice

(PRWEB) January 28, 2012

SakatoonThe Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board dismissed the latest attempt by unions affiliated with the Saskatchewan Federation of Labour (SFL) to stop the Christian Labour Association of Canada (CLAC) from representing construction workers in the province.

The board ruled that the unions, including ones representing retail and government employees, cannot intervene in CLACs application to represent employees of several construction contractors working in Saskatchewan.

This is a huge victory for construction workers across Saskatchewan, says Dennis Perrin, CLAC Prairies director. It means they are one step closer to being able to select a union of their own choosing.

The decision by the board follows months of hearings and litigation in which unions affiliated with the SFLincluding non-construction onesattempted to block Saskatchewan construction workers from exercising their charter right to freedom of association in choosing which union they want to represent them.

The passage of Bill 80 in 2010, which amended the Saskatchewan Construction Industry Labour Relations Act, granted unions such as CLAC the legal right to represent construction workers in the province, ending nearly twenty years of legislated monopoly.

Unions with the SFL should focus on meeting the needs of their members instead of trying to preserve their monopoly, says Perrin. Union competition in Saskatchewans construction industry is long overdue. When workers have choice in representation, it makes all unions more accountable to their members concerns.

————————————————

CLAC is an independent Canadian labour union representing over 50,000 workers in a wide range of sectorsconstruction, health care, retail, service, transportation, manufacturing, and others. Based on principles that promote the values of respect, dignity, fairness, and integrity, CLACs approach to labour relations stresses membership advocacy, cooperation, and the long term interests of the workplace community.

# # #



More Legal Terms Press Releases

NJ governor rejects affordable housing bill, sends it back to legislature

NJ governor rejects affordable housing bill, sends it back to legislature

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie kept his promise, vetoing the most recent version of a controversial affordable housing bill that he says has drastically changed from the version he supported.

Christie has maintained that the iteration of the bill that passed the state Senate in June was the superior piece of legislation, but that it ran into problems in the Assembly. It was revised several times and after seven months of back-and-forth between both chambers, the Assembly and Senate jointly approved the latest version. However, Christie said their compromised legislation wasn’t good enough.

“This bill, for many municipalities, is worse than the existing system,” the governor said in his veto message. He sent a new version of the bill back to the legislature that was nearly identical to the one proposed in June.

Both versions of the bill favored abolishing the Council on Affordable Housing, the state-run program that critics say has done more harm than good in terms of delivering affordable apartments to low- and middle-income residents. However the latest iteration included a requirement that towns set aside 10 percent of their entire housing stock as affordable units for low-income tenants. Christie favors the previous version’s requirement, which mandates only 10 percent of new construction be reserved for affordable housing.

Affordable housing advocates had their issues with the current bill, but said Christie’s move to veto it was no help either.

“The governor sided with wealthy towns that want to keep out bus drivers, waitresses and public employees,” Kevin Walsh, associate director of the Fair Share Housing Center, told the Star-Ledger.

Assemblyman Jerry Green sponsored the latest iteration of the bill and said the version Christie supports would not hold up in court. He cited a legal opinion by the Office of Legislative Services that said the bill could violate the state constitution.

“The governor has now made it clear that he supports unconstitutional legislation that imposes higher fees on New Jersey businesses,” said Green. “Our bill was backed by a broad range of businesses, housing advocates, legal experts and local officials who understood it was the best way to provide housing for working class residents, create jobs and spark the economy. The governor, sadly, wants higher business taxes and a court fight.”

Walsh had previously told reporters the bill did little to encourage towns to develop more cheap apartments and actually removed several key requirements that sought to keep affordable housing development at a steady level.

Jim Sarone is a writer for My Cheap Apartments specializing inĀ  <a rel=”nofollow” onclick=”javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/outgoing/article_exit_link']);” href=”http://www.mycheapapartments.com”>cheap apartments</a>and the <a rel=”nofollow” onclick=”javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/outgoing/article_exit_link']);” href=”http://www.mycheapapartments.com”>affordable housing</a>markets.


Article from articlesbase.com